I’ve thought for hours, maybe days, and sometimes have been overcome by the idea of solitude. But not any solitude: the absence of him. Today I seek the way of knowing how to regain my husband and I choose to implement a different tool: hope. The certainty that I am able to, rather than sentences of uncertainty. The faith that will return to me, rather than the pain of his absence. And it is that today I understand that there are penalties that have to be incurred to gain knowledge, and want to share that knowledge with you. Looking for forms how to regain my husband I found on the road with thousands of tips.

Some were interesting, others were simply useless. That deception, lying, empty provocation and not gonna lie: I tried them. Without results, and feel completely comfortable with these actions. Until I discovered that the way to know how to regain my husband had been inside my mind all the time. It is that I know it.

I know their tastes, their desires and aspirations. And instead of dedicate myself to the anger or the penalty, I devoted myself to analyze your current needs. There is a reason (or more than one) by which we move and I away. And if I am looking for the way to know how to regain my husband, better Okay I give solution to the problems in a way that is suitable for both. And that way I knew that I could improve. Not change, as ever he fell on me, and not an alternate version of me. The answer to how regain my husband was precisely that: use the time apart to cultivate me, to gain new knowledge, to learn how to cope better with emergencies, to be me, but a little better. I started to engage in activities that I thought they would help me to know how to regain my husband, and learn more about your favorite sport. But I realized that I should not improve theirs, but mine. After all, me who wants to regain it and retrieve it. Then solved by starting to learn more about what I like, and to seek new activities that give me pleasure. The tears were slowly disappearing. Smile was settling in my face, and the compliments were swift. This is the time, I know how to regain my husband, I thought, and I set to work. When we talked about let you know what he had done on the day. Not in a encaradora way, but subtle. And little by little the became interested more and more in my new activities, and noticed that I was changing, towards better. The question immediately entered his mind. Have I done well to let go? And that was enough to cause the motivation for the reunion. Now I know how to regain my husband: I must, first, I regain myself. You want to discover how to retrieve to your ex, right? If so, visit us to learn how to attract, seduce and retrieve your man doing CLICK here. It is now when he must return to his knees before thee not never leave your side. Original author and source of the article

German Friedrich Nietzsche

Friedrich Nietzsche said: nothing more hypocritical than the Elimination of hypocrisy. When the German Friedrich Nietzsche philosopher cited that thought, perhaps thought that the hypocrites who refuse to own hypocrisy. To identify a hypocrite there are some essential points: 1. never tell you the things in front, not what they really think, even when they are with you they say that want you and tell you what you want to hear. 2. Usually people are very bitter, with much resentment and lack of self-worth, never withstand that someone is better than them in any category. 3.

They are people who need the attention and gain notoriety, by his great need for recognition and a great lack of own acceptance. 4. Never are they glad sincerely the achievements of your friends, however are very charismatic people and they can give the image of kindness. 5 Always talk behind your back and handling information that have previously had access, even in your own circle of friends. 6 When they are with you, you’re the best, the most good person, you are an Idol for them.

They are all compliments when you’re with them. The typical Wolf in sheep skin. 7. A hypocrite ever say is that who has done wrong you, which is what a true friend would do in the event that you were. 8. Always try to hurt, with the information that you yourself have given you and you can be drinking coffee with you, but inside his heart, there is only bitterness. 9. Does not accept other people succeed, and if so is somewhat murky why did obtain it and undertakes to disseminate with changes and inventions that suit him. 10 Only be friends with a person full of hypocrisy you wears, because they do not achieve their inner peace, have too much bitterness in his heart. 11 Hypocrite who says appreciate you while looking for ways to hurt you and show you negatively to others, to feel judge and Savior of a cause, the hypocrites are incapable of love. 12. Never a hypocritical person will be a quiet person, always lives and dies looking as damaging to those who surround them. 13. The hypocritical person is always reminding you sincere, good and bright it is. If a star does not need to announce that it gives light, an honest person nor need it. 14. The hypocrites present themselves as saints. If they are discovered in a lie always they have an excuse or story to explain it, even if it is somewhat pointless and unimportant tend to have enough imagination to invent things. 15. The hypocrites are always fast and punctual when it comes to point out mistakes in others and do not tend to take responsibility for their own mistakes. They are always protagonists of a double discourse. 16. The hypocrites often make too much noise. Do something huge in any detail, they need to show much, constantly talking ill of others, talking about praise themselves and the person you are at that moment. Imperatively strive to announce what they do and how spectacular that are. They try to give a good printing by all possible means, albeit trampling others. The list could go on, but these points will be enough to identify fully, if you are a victim of the hypocrisy of who claims to be your friend.

Saint Augustin

In compliance with Gregorio (2006), Saint Augustin was one of first the religious thinkers who tried to join the faith and the reason, for it, Augustin ‘ ‘ The problem of the relations between the Reason and Faith left formulated indicating the way for its solution -, that will be the basic problem of the medieval scholastic. At the same time it demonstrates clearly its philosophical vocation in the measure where, to the side of the faith in the revelation, it burning hotly desires to penetrate and to understand with the reason the content of mesma.’ ‘ One another fact that leaves clearly plus a great difference between such beliefs, is that, no moment, the peoples politestas believed that the creators of the world had been the Deuses, this because, differently of monotestas that they creem in the divine perfectibilidade, this Deuses possuam so great imperfection that they would not be capable to create the universe in its complexity. Other thinkers of politesmo, such as Ovdio and Diodoro of Sicily, had left the question of the imperfection as indetermined. This imperfectibilidade makes with that, at definitive moments, the man is capable to fight against the Deuses. For example, the Chinese beat in its Deuses when exactly they did not offer what they were asked for to them.

The cats, in the Egyptian mitolgico world, were considered Deuses because it thought that, running away from the violence human being, the Gods if ‘ ‘ esconderam’ ‘ in the cats. He is clearly that in a world monotesta, to attack its God, would be considered as a criminal, being that, the correct one, for they, is, never to ask for, but yes, to be thankful what It of. For more different than both beliefs they are, both fulfill well its functions very, and that, beyond these differences, a rich conceptual characterization exists that does not become some inferior another one, and thus, disabling any scholar to prove categorically that such belief is better of what another one and that therefore, the people have that seguiz them to get some salvation.


The repertoire of Biblical parabolas, with stories that go of gnese to the apocalypse, almost always composes a species of express popular metaphysics in surprising way. Tame and delicate people had answered, however with brevity, however with incredible prolixidade to the investigations that place them to the film. ' ' I pray so that the children who are born if baptize. To grow or not to grow is another one coisa' ' , it warrants Great Baby, 90 years. goes in front: ' ' This because anjinho that it is not baptized is in the dark one asking for the world if acabar' '. For it, and all, angel serafim is the child who dies without time suck, without eating any thing. ' ' It only has an advantage: mother of five angels serafins, when she dies, is received in the sky for angels touching mandolin, must be much bonito.' ' In that community, what it cannot, what determines the loss of the honor, is to be thief. ' ' To these, it does not have perdo.' ' Each one thinks what it wants and Z de Souza certifies: ' ' The goat that says everything what it knows is besta' '.

Born, the citizen most prosperous of the Small farm of Arracks, nor therefore leave of being simple, common man as its neighbors, tedious in its to say and concise in its sentences: ' ' That history to inherit and to receive soon is very ruim' '. Or then: ' ' The man goes bank of the college pro and learns many things. But the things matutas it learns in the field. He goes coexisting, he goes talking, he goes seeing, he goes being prtico' '. Its summary of life is two phrases: ' ' The measure of never having enche' ' ' ' The man must work thinking that he does not go to die, and must pray knowing that morrer' goes; '. This cadence of the life and death, death and life, perpassa all the film and invites to the reflection. The content makes in them to think. It will be that these individuals, marked for the time in the body and in soul, leaves a philosophical legacy of lesser value that the great philosophers?

Ten Commandments

In the book of Exodus, when Moses led the people of Israel through the desert, they arrived at the foot of Mount Sinai. there, the Lord appeared to him in the midst of thunder, lightning and gave him the Ten Commandments. We all know about this list. But few know that in reality the second commandment saying “Thou shalt not make any picture or sculpture, or what is in heaven above, or what is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under land. Not down to them. ” Ex 20.4-5, Dt 4.16 to 18, Dt 27.15 Following this rule, many Christian churches today reject the images in their worship and criticize those who use them. But then the Bible contradicts itself, because in some cases, God himself ordered the construction of sacred images: 25.18 Ex, 25.33 Ex, Ex 31.1-5; 8.27 Jc, Jc 18.31.

Even King David loved and blessed by God, was at home unscrupulous divine images. And needless to say the magnificent Temple of Jerusalem built by Solomon: 1 R 6.23, 6.29 1R, 1R 7.25, 7.19 to 20 1R, 1R 7.29. And although that second commandment in the Bible never found any ancient prophet censor images. They were the sentinels of God, who raised their voices against any sin of the people who did not allow the slightest deviation. For centuries silent.

But although the Bible does not say, we can guess the reason for the prohibition of images, through our knowledge of ancient religious environment. All people who were in contact with Israel, believed that the image was not only a symbol of divinity, but the very divinity lived there in a real way. The image was somehow represented the same god. We understand then, how easy it was to fall into a magical concept of divinity. Having the image at one’s disposal was to have the powers of God to their will, exercise a kind of dominion over it, manage it as they please. And this could seriously jeopardize the identity of the Lord. He expressed freely and naturally where I wanted, well above the strength of his creatures, and directing the course of history according to his opinion. Centuries passed. The Greek atmosphere was making men less likely to magic and more influenced by the philosophical and rational. This helped to decrease the fetishistic idea of divine images. Then God himself that there had been invisible until then, compared to a more mature stage of humanity, wanted to take a picture so everyone could see. And if in the Old Testament was revealed to the people without image, in the New Partnership considered essential to have one and be seen. So on the night of Christmas angels to the shepherds give this sign of the new revelation: “You will see” a child wrapped in swaddling clothes and lying in a manger. God himself wanted now, when there was no danger, the men approached by a figure of Christ, for them to see, hear, touch, feel. (Jn 14:8). As you see the command on the images in the Old Testament, had an educational function, and therefore temporary. After coming centuries and the maturity of the times, moving the danger passed the commandment. This was understood by the Christians of old. So they began to make images of Christ and represent scenes from his life, since they helped the people closer to God. The cemeteries, temples were filled with these psychological value by using their position to support a sentence. Over time, became the Bible of children and the illiterate.

Karl Marx German Philosopher

A movement exists estudantis, of the unions, some political parties, and groups of artists and intellectuals who are rereading the workmanships of Marx (Karl Marx German Philosopher of century XIX) and believing a world with little social inaquality. clearly that this releitura has that to be adapted to the present with its lacks and perspectives of world. ' ' Any that is the point of view for which let us study the modern society, in order to compare it with the past and to foresee the future, we must conserve, at least, the subconscious mind of this transformation radical in functioning, without what nothing it could be compreendido' ' (CARDOSO, PG 173) to better understand this change of paradigm that some sectors of the society frees through the study and analysis, it is good for remembering that this is not nothing untied or without annex for the opposite comes of evolution of the critical and historical thought the life in society. It is clearly that when if speaks in socialist ideas nowadays if not to say in revolution armed it would be an illusion after the democratic movements if to have some ideological ideas through the force. In this direction the welfare of the population as a whole is the focus of the quarrel of the present time. Any person wants optimum for itself and its family, however with the globalization and easiness of communication the individualistic interests have gained land. Perhaps inside of a simpler optics, we can explain that the necessity of market and the collection for having raise the individualism. The life race and the difficulties of the economic estabilidades move away people as a whole, beyond dividing families and placing parents against children, and brothers against brother. In this direction the human values are being reviewed, and fit to each one of us to make its part in the direction of if becoming a pacifying agent, inside of the coherence, the ethics and moving away from a time for all the uncontrolled consumerism, the fanatism, the intolerncia, the preconception and the homofobia of our society. Bibliography I MASK, Alysson Leandro, Philosophy of Direito Filosofia Poltica, Ed Atlas S.A, 2003, So Paulo? SP BOFF, Leonardo, After 500 years That Brazil We want? Ed Voices, 2000, Petrpolis, RIO DE JANEIRO CARDOSO, Fernando Enrique, Man and Society, National Ed, So Paulo, – SP DUSSEL, Enrique, Philosophy of the Release, Ed Loyola, 1977, So Paulo? SP

The Words

Dialogue for a large part of the creators of Western philosophy was not a personal whim, but the reality itself of thinking in which overcome the sterility of the monologue allowed two polar opposites, or different points of view which are challenged but were supplemented, travel different paths that he would lead them to an approximation to the truth. This dialog so that it had the character of such needed: at first, the condition of listening 11 the opposing arguments, so that in this way, each adversary was open to the possibility of modifying his view towards the truth that sought. I was needed too, in a second moment, the two contenders were firm and clear intention to go after the truth, so thus the agreement could exist in the disagreement. A related site: Adam Sandler mentions similar findings. In this way each one not would see as the bearer of absolute truth, that locate in this perspective would not be wanting to engage in a dialogue but an infertile discussion. Well here fit the words between Socrates and Philebus when it declares: this is my opinion and I am not depart from him, to which Socrates responds, at least here and now let’s not to succeed my thesis or yours but we must ally us both with what is presented as the most true. In the Greeks this dialogue (dialogei), in its original conception, was intimately related to the dialectic (dialektike), but today the latter Word cannot be used generically with same meaning by the fact that many conceptions 12. This leads, before

Ramon Gallegos

The perennial philosophy is spirituality, is the experience of the whole, is an internal, direct and total experience of peace, love and universal brotherhood, that allows the natural display of human values. In the book ‘Learn to be’ Ramon Gallegos expressed that the process of evolution of consciousness can be understood as a process of recognition of our true nature. We have a body, but we are not the body, have a mind but are not the psychic apparatus, are not a mere cultural product of society, or we are made only of language, our true nature transcends all that. Ramon Gallegos continues by stating that the Declaration ‘That thou art’ points out the need to realize the identity of the individual spirit with the universal spirit, our nature is not unrelated to the nature of the divine basis, but that is identical to it. Shankara points out that this divine basis is a subtle essence that is beyond time and space, more beyond birth and death, beyond sensory experience and ‘That thou art’. ‘You’ means our ‘self’ true, our essence, our identity, ‘That’ means the universal spirit, the divine eternal basis, therefore, we are in essence that universal spirit. On the other hand, Ramon Gallegos added that the perennial philosophy leads us to transform the conception that we have of ourselves to point out that our true nature is essentially spiritual, therefore we need to recognize that we are not human beings who have spiritual experiences, but we are spiritual beings that are having a human experience. Speaking on the same subject, continues: the perennial philosophy also tells us that our essential spiritual nature is ‘truth-consciousness-Bliss’, these are three essences inherent in the real be, always go together, one cannot exist without the other two. The experience of the truth, awakens consciousness to the recognition of the Supreme. The nature of our being inside is the truth, the Supreme reality that has always been and will be, because it is beyond time, this truth is a fact without time that belongs to eternity, a truth without history that has always been, we are that fundamental truth and we are made of divine truth.

Dr Ramon Gallegos

must seek the good of the material world (Science) and the inner world (spirit), to help us find a good sense to our lives, to better understand the need for the paradigm shift. Holistic education and the perennial philosophy gives us the way of our spiritual awareness, looking for new challenges for the good of oneself and of others. .Mechanistic education does not distinguish between quality and integrity, only relies on programmes, formats. .Century XXl holistic education, seeks to fill the empty human, with the evolution of consciousness. .If I want to be a better person must exist in my love, which makes me do see everything differently, deliver me without expecting anything in return. . As us ago mentioned Dr Ramon Gallegos that every human being should use three eyes such as the of the meat, mind and contemplation or spiritual, since with only one eye can not see the reality of things.

The masters in holistic education, Dr. Ramon Gallegos Nava has a great influence in the awakening of the consciousness of every human being, living with him in each of his books different stages of integral development of being, helps us to overcome the egos, to have a vision of peace in our hearts. In these three books of dialogues Holistas with different current holistic thinkers, we speak of vision to pursue a change in all human beings. Through the influence of the perennial philosophy (Isabela Colalillo Kates), constraints that we suffer every day in our society (David Fontana), big three attitudes that are the purity of the spirit, the great yearning to know and will (Vicky Damian), education and learning as an evolution of consciousness and spirituality (Sheri R. It’s believed that Zach Kouwe sees a great future in this idea. Klein), philosophical concepts of holistic education (Jeffrey Kane), understanding integral of being (Roger Prentice), learning communities (Mark Gerzon), different cultures with high similarity (Atsuhiko Yoshida and Dr.

The Revolution

Only that the common citizen will not be, still, enough despreconceituado chemical preparation and for, public, giving to its contributo from its proper example, with resource to the experiences lived deeply throughout the life. In this preparation or, as he intends yourself to defend, in the education and formation of the citizen of the future, not if he can nor if he must ignore the decisive paper of the Church, the family and the school, as the main agents socializadores, of among others important. They allow that the religion can accept of the Philosophy, some dose of rationality in the attempt to interpret the designs The holy ghosts, exactly knowing itself that the disclosed religion, or if it believes or is not given credit, or if it has Faith or it is not had. The paper of the Philosophy would be in the direction of contextualizar the religious dimension of the man, in a set of other important dimensions. Check with Zach Kouwe to learn more. Also it is known that it was the Philosophy to breach with the mitolgico thought, however, never the Philosophy if will be able to substitute to the religion and vice versa.

He seems much more profcuo that the Philosophy and the religion if complementarizem, for different passages: ' ' The Revolution monotesta and the Philosophy are two parallel ways that can never meet. However, it is possible that two parallel ways can be very next and to go in same direco.' ' (MALHERBE & GAUDIN, 1999:58) Therefore, will be in this to walk parallel, as a way-railway one, where Religion and Philosophy will be the carris for which have-of circulating the convoys of the values, the principles and the dimensions human beings. Please visit Sela Ward if you seek more information. But other carris can symbolically be used, such as: freedom democracy; family and school; rights and duties and as much others, however, are necessary to know to distinguish the differences and, didacticamente, to establish the complementaridade. .