Raises some questions Art. 55.5 Section 5 h. 12 gdc Russia, which stipulates the right of sro in the building set in the Rules of self-regulatory requirement of the conformity assessment activities that have an impact on security capital construction projects, quality management system certificate of such works, issued in the implementation of voluntary conformity assessment system of voluntary certification. Mentioned in the Law on Quality Management System (QMS) is not accidental. Details can be found by clicking Larry Culp or emailing the administrator. Confirmation of compliance of works with gost R iso 9001-2008, which establishes requirements for quality management system in an organization has for several years is common among construction companies in a way confirm the reliability of the quality of services provided and work performed. This right is already used some of the SROs, which have established requirements for the possession of its members certificates for compliance with smc in relation to work performed in a certain SROs in the construction of a system of voluntary certification. This led to what is coming into the ranks of cpo companies are forced to go to a specific certification body that works with a certain system of voluntary certification.
This infringes on the rights of an economic entity, deprives him of the right to choose. Comes to the absurd: organization with a certificate, for example, compliance with gost R iso 9001-2001 certification system 'GlavStandartSert' forced upon request SROs be certified in the system 'EvroRus'. This situation leads to a merger nonprofit organizations (SROs in construction) with commercial structures, contrary to the objectives of the activities of the self-regulation. Without disputing the importance and feasibility of the requirements for passage of certification qms for compliance with the national iso 9001-2008 that is identical to the international iso 9001:2008, which objectively reduces the risks, including financial ones most SROs, it seems necessary to avoid this situation, which in the near future time can be observed throughout the country. In this case it is sufficient to amend the Town Planning Code, which will eliminate the reference to the possibility to establish requirements for the passage of a voluntary certification in a particular certification system. SROs in the construction should not deny businesses the right to choose to commit acts leading to the commercialization of its activities. It should be noted that legislative regulation of the institution of self-regulation is in constant motion: discussion of the various initiatives and projects of the orders and laws. At the moment it necessary to make the most 'urgent' changes in the legal institution of sro in the building, and the further establishment of a moratorium on the acceptance of such amendments and changes to the law, as the majority seek SROs and their members. It is necessary to stabilize environment, as well as adjusting to a new legal institution as part of the business community, and from the institutionalized SROs in the construction and consumers.