Although assuming this thesis is descriptive correct, would serve it of reply to the ethical one, when it questions the moral truth? Since that the ethical one speaks of what the people must make or believe, and not of what they really make this thesis logically does not deny what it supports. To broaden your perception, visit Related Group. Descriptive affirmations do not invalidate the normative ones, therefore, they do not lock up the subject. But it wants this to say that all the practical moral vary of culture for culture? Let us examine more than close. Would be all the practical so diverse moral how much affirm the relativismo? If to exist exceptions to the rule of the diversity, will be they who had so only the accidental similarities between the cultures, or to the universal characteristics of the man in society? Doubtlessly similarities exist. It is known that all the cultures have taboos against the incest, for example, and against the indiscriminate homicide inside of the group. Exactly where the practical moral particular they vary, relative areas of value to the necessities human beings can readily be identified: life and health, economic satisfaction, marriage and family. It would be this mere accident? It will not have some common base for such similarities? The thesis of the diversity more still fails in distinguishing the diversity in practical particular moral from the diversity in implicit principles in such concepts.
The practical ones, as much how much the moral rules are guided by more including concepts. In this manner, the way as the societies defines the property rights and as they punish delinquents can vary widely, more still thus equally they will be worried about the conservation of the particular property, as much how much with the punishment of the evildoers. The diversity seems to more apply the specific situations of what the principles. Many accepted beliefs without critical could change with more adequate information and moral clarification, in order significantly to reduce the ethical diversity that the relativistas describe. .
For many, the day is only one skill to play the problems pro air and to live a life without responsibilities. But, in contrast of this, to be a pilgrim is to take for itself the responsibility that the other did not take. How? For the incessant interior search, the pilgrim auto-evaluates its character, behavior, defects, virtues and what he can make to live in peace with its fellow creature. Made this, it who already possesss fagulha of wisdom, has the humildade to know that he meets only in the threshold of the knowledge and that still he remains to it very to learn.
However, after all the stages that it needed to pass and the teachings who got through its studies and reflections, it decide to pass its knowledge all ahead, therefore already it is of its nature to leave its legacy for the others. Of the side of here, the life goes passing But some wake up for the fact of the pilgrim are in way to certain follow it e, through the way that it it left, for the books that wrote scribbles or words that had been said ‘ ‘ foot-of-ouvido’ ‘ of its call He is obvious that to this height it has who thinks that travelling is a religious traveller Therefore travelling in fact she is a traveller. But its trip is purely spiritual-mental. all its knowledge comes of God, the Great Creator. How gets it? Therefore he is, only following its steps to discover. Unhappyly, they are not all that obtain the least to see the way, that will say to follow it as everything what it is good passes fast, thus our life also it is. Then when the following one starts to try the good flavor of the knowledge and the virtue, many times perceive the time that lost and so little that still remains. It is accurately in this point, where it is the beauty of the learning, therefore the pilgrim also thought about this and left its learning for that occasion and he gets who it, little imports with the days or years that lack to it, therefore already has the certainty to have really used it of correct form and knows the true one meant of death. But it will be that the way really exists? In fact, of the side of here, we will only be able to enxergar it if a pilgrim to hold our hand and placing in them in the certain direction In another way, it can be depended on perhaps If thus the way will still not be seen, in this point, the reply never will be answered.