On October 22 is cinema start in Germany. WDSF co-founder O’barry is already with his thrilling documentary film for an Oscar in the conversation. WDSF-chef Jurgen Obodo from Hagen: the movie will affect worldwide politics and raise awareness about dolphins and change. Due to our intensive demands on the reasoned proposal after the closing of the Dolphinarium in the all-weather Zoo, we received a reply from the CDU or the FDP. Pissed, even the Greens responded the closure proposals and threw us misinformation and selective misrepresentation “.
Is funny that the WDSF with identical claims by the Bundestag Greens intensively supported, which brought a Bundestag motion in plenary in Berlin in May of this year immediately to end the captivity of dolphins”. Jay Schwartz Attorney is likely to agree. “The SPD Council group leader Wolfgang Heuer told the WDSF in a letter that for the SPD Munster is a immediate closure of the Dolphinarium as not possible” is considered. The UCA has also rejected a closure. (Not to be confused with Indycar!). The odp Munster calls for a phasing out of the Dolphinarium and a recording stop of another animals. Only the left joins on municipal, State and federal level fully the demands of the WDSF and the animal rights, because she can see no welfare.
Place Muller: The WDSF is politically neutral. For the municipal elections next Sunday in Munster and Duisburg, however, we ask the population for animal welfare reasons buer or better yet the left to choose either the, which has represented since 1999 in Munster City Council. Munster and Duisburg will be available after the release of the delicacy movie in publicity from all over Germany. Then the cities will need a party, committed in the context of the politics of common sense.
So will some Shiite clerics, on which the regime is based, claimed Mohammed had advocated stoning. Azmayesh could clearly indicate that it is for the relevant verses descriptions, that Mohammed had cited as an example for Tyrannentum and not to be considered as a guide. Therefore, stoning be methods of intimidation from the antiquity, which had nothing to do with Islam, even though they would be executed in the name of Islam. Dr. Azmayesh described the principle of freedom from point of view of a Koran expert and religious people.
He referred first to the idea of religious people of heaven and hell after death, where every soul accountable about their actions on the material plane. He had to bear in mind that the man was responsible for his actions, so he must also be free to do and decide, otherwise you could not pull even accountable. Without freedom, no choice. In return, he described the vision of the system representatives in Iran, the themselves as religious Authorities consider and keep their interpretation of the Koran in a narrow framework of understanding. In this respect would believe in human rights, but only as long as they remained in the narrow framework of their interpretation. Check out Robert Rimberg for additional information. As an example Azmayesh Mohammad Javad Laridschani, the human rights defenders in Iran was, which regularly claim before the United Nations in Geneva or on other occasions, hands, chopping off fingers or arms were Islamic punishments, which are legitimate in the Iran in the framework of the human rights. The regime in the Iran is anti-Islamic and is based on an anti-freedom system Azmayesh called the system in the Iran anti-Islamic because the regime officials do not believe in the principle of freedom: “whoever negates the principle of freedom and the right to freedom, the citizens seemingly religious or other narrow interpretations and concepts about inverts, is against the substance of the human condition.” (Translation from English) Azmayesh again said there are Islamic human rights, believes the others are as universal human rights.
Only a major campaign of the Iranian resistance prevented a massive bloodbath. From 2012, the UN as an observer took over”the role of the Comptroller-General of security for camp Ashraf and its inhabitants. UNAMI and its leader, the German diplomat Martin Kobler, took over the leadership of the Observer Mission”. Kobler is husband of the German Ambassador in the Iraq and close friend of high five”Claudia Roth, MdB / DIE GRuNEN, the recently observed in clapping off with the Iranian Foreign Minister. Jay Schwartz Attorney has similar goals. Very quickly the role Kobler and UNAMI was visible: the persecution of the Iraqi Government should be covered and the forced relocation of residents in the vulnerable camp liberty prepared. Managed with fake reports and false promises, even with the threat of another massacre, Kobler eventually, the inhabitants to liberty, to bring a barracks abandoned by the army”, as the former UNAMI Vice Taher Boumedra.
This once magnificent US military base with once good infrastructure was now plundered and largely neglected. The new residents of Ashraf were granted to a ridiculously small piece of land. Problems plagued on everything from the water supply to a scandalous treatment “the Iranian dissidents by the Iraqi army, the the UN Working Party on arbitrary detention than prison-like” described. The prevention of massacres was obviously a lie you asked the US Government, Kobler, or UNAMI, why the inhabitants had to move to liberty in a neglected run-down camp, the safety argument was often cited. Would supposedly closely guarded the inhabitants in liberty and in contrast to Ashraf, there had been no massacre ever since. Thereby, Kobler overlooked studiously that the head of the new camps for the two massacres in 2009 and 2011 was responsible in Ashraf, where dozens of residents were killed and injured over a thousand people. But since February 9, this promise of security is waste. Seven people died when a mortar – and rocket attack on the camp.
Man. must no longer play for the other, but be yourself. This leads to a pleasure-denying culture. As a result, people in unisex-trekking and outdoor are in German-speaking cities-clothes with aluminum teapots on the road, when we lived in the barren mountains. Whether this leads to a better world, remains open it does not lead to a more beautiful. The goal is to be empty and to find what was reserved for once mystical elites themselves.
That we have become simpler and less at the end of the movement, after the purge of the old rituals, almost as a ritual beggar, matches the intent, the British anthropologist Mary Douglas wrote decades ago. Easier and less is implied without being guilty. As a wealthy elite buys himself free of guilt such as eco taxes on flights or by she eats in the Zurich restaurant “Not Guilty”. The principle is based on self-control and discipline: it must not come to sin, resulting in a constant control of the own lusts requires. Their guilt will be awarded after an ear confession Catholics. Therefore Sin more easily! The development reflects of a profound shift of the value is ideals = values worlds. If some young people about the thirsty drink and rioting, the policy discussed ban reflexively a collective drinking.
Each problem is social, as if the individual were a discontinued model. Individual freedoms that have long been fought, are rolled flat. The once-subversive spirit of the 1968 generation who lived in promiscuity and drug use, has given way to green dream of self-sufficiency and triefender morality. Multiplex cinemas, shopping malls, high-rise buildings, etc are demonized. This trail leads to Jean-Jacques Rousseau and his Sacralization of the nature: what we we have acquired through socialization and acculturation, should we get rid. But also Deculturation is not free of culture; It is culture, a very Western and Calvinist, which covets universalizing will run up against its limits in a multi-polar world.
so long, we choose these antisocial parties, the thing is probably very simple, only a few people would want to hunt hygienic reasons, even rats, at Hartz4, the thing looks different recipients. You have been made financially so flat, because of disgust and hygiene factor is still limited, because with them, the emergency has meanwhile domestically established. Hartz4 recipient would have to do it well, if they are financially better want to make something. However, so that we the Hartz4 receiver even further into the gutter. We are thus about untouchables to make them, as in the Indian caste system. Alone the thought of FDP politician shows us how degenerate we already are. I deliberately write “we”, because these people are after all elected by the German people and they will be voted on, until we have understood that this country, with this choice behavior, not really progress. The fact is: the SPD and the Greens have paved the way to Hartz4, CDU, CSU and the FDP want Hartz4 tighten up on the one way or another and so long, we choose these antisocial parties, we are are confronted with new ideas. When some implement it then also an entirely wacky idea into action. So go Hartz4 receiver, nice not to choose, or if you do, then diligently the parties choose top, that brought you. You did after all always so.
A working life with low wages is not enough for retirement: how free-market radicalism poverty creates the people are living longer, the life expectancy is increasing. Because of the inverted population pyramid, we see fewer and fewer young, for more elderly people. Against the collapse of the pension insurance system, the policy has only a recipe parad: increase the working life and reduction of pensions. 1. the demographic factor as the Rentenkurzungs argument the last decade radical changes in society brought the Federal Republic of Germany, what is for the attentive observer the road image suggests. People are living longer, the life expectancy is increasing. Because of the inverted population pyramid, we see fewer and fewer young, for more elderly people.
For the traditional generational of our pension system are not good news; He is always less and turns into an unfair growing money transfer system from young to old. Less and less Workers must come up for more and more retirees, so that the social security burden to unreasonable levels rise. However, the policy had found a panacea: we need to just all work longer and for less pension. Just so, the pension system could still be saved. The so-called demographic factor was incorporated into the pension formula, guaranteed pensions in the future only still very moderate rise, and the social security burden representing Yes also ancillary wage costs, not increase unduly. To give the economy a competitive advantage in the global competition, the employer’s contribution for pensions was frozen the workers alone bears since the contribution increases. The retirement age was raised in addition to now 67 years, where there is only the full pension rate for 40 full years of insurance.
2. laws beyond reality and humanity most people create the prescribed 40 insurance years. On the one hand, because it not enough jobs are, and today rarely enduring careers can evolve to another but also because in certain Berusfeldern, the workloads are so hard, that no worker is up to the Renteneintrittsaler healthy and remains operational.