The immersed oppressed one in the context takes care of to this order and in this oppressed oppressing game x both do not bring the conscience of itself, but it finishes that oppressing and oppressed they live shade one of the other, therefore to exert control, must yourself be opened hand of itself exactly and finishes yourself for being so oppressed how much that he is being oppressed. When the oppressed ones only obtain to become free themselves saw of it of the oppressors, leaving its mooring cables, reverse speed-creating and constructing its history, it can free its oppressors and make the civilization to walk. Until century XVII the impulse was seen as passive, today the civilizatrio impulse is understood as constructed from challenges; Freire (2002) says regarding the feeling of some social classrooms of incompletude and inacabamento, is the impulse that promotes advances, that of form here exactly distorted, therefore in the truth the oppressed one wants to occupy the place of oppressor. So that a literature is understood as of and with the oppressed one, it has that to be contextualizada, next to the difficulties and necessities of the oppressed ones well. When literature is for or on the oppressed one, it is distant and it cannot inside be considered of the subject of the oppression. Freire was a master in the writing on the oppressed one, it considered that the oppressed one if respects if Liberte of mooring cables of the oppressor who constructs to its identity respecting its peculiarities. Quotation three forms to react of the oppressed one in relation to the oppression: It naturalizes: it reads the world with the eyes of the oppressor; Fatalismo: it sees the differences, but if it conforms with it; Liberator: she sees the differences and she fights for a dignity space; Inside of these three forms of reaction, it brings the reflection of that stops having impulse must have oppressed.