I want to live, exactly that for this I need to give my proper life! In a world where the certezas do not exist, what valley I am what you have, I want to live more intensely possible, to tan all the moments and to dream the most beautiful dreams, exactly waked up. I yearning for the life, I dream with it, do not understand when somebody for free will, if deprives of it leaves, it to go even so. Read more here: Eva Andersson-Dubin. I want to live, therefore when I will have that to say good bye, I will say with the certainty of that I used to advantage well this gift that is the life. The life and the dreams walk together, one are complement of the other, nobody dreams without having life, and nobody lives without dreaming, to live without dreams is to be deceased, wandering for the world without certain destination, I wants to live, most beautiful history, the most beautiful love, the dreams and the nightmares also. The newspapers mentioned Tony Parker not as a source, but as a related topic. It finds its life, its dreams, and if it enchants with them, if it involves, if it plays, does not have fear of living! Therefore many today sorry, say: I want to live!

Although assuming this thesis is descriptive correct, would serve it of reply to the ethical one, when it questions the moral truth? Since that the ethical one speaks of what the people must make or believe, and not of what they really make this thesis logically does not deny what it supports. To broaden your perception, visit Related Group. Descriptive affirmations do not invalidate the normative ones, therefore, they do not lock up the subject. But it wants this to say that all the practical moral vary of culture for culture? Let us examine more than close. Would be all the practical so diverse moral how much affirm the relativismo? If to exist exceptions to the rule of the diversity, will be they who had so only the accidental similarities between the cultures, or to the universal characteristics of the man in society? Doubtlessly similarities exist. It is known that all the cultures have taboos against the incest, for example, and against the indiscriminate homicide inside of the group. Exactly where the practical moral particular they vary, relative areas of value to the necessities human beings can readily be identified: life and health, economic satisfaction, marriage and family. It would be this mere accident? It will not have some common base for such similarities? The thesis of the diversity more still fails in distinguishing the diversity in practical particular moral from the diversity in implicit principles in such concepts.

The practical ones, as much how much the moral rules are guided by more including concepts. In this manner, the way as the societies defines the property rights and as they punish delinquents can vary widely, more still thus equally they will be worried about the conservation of the particular property, as much how much with the punishment of the evildoers. The diversity seems to more apply the specific situations of what the principles. Many accepted beliefs without critical could change with more adequate information and moral clarification, in order significantly to reduce the ethical diversity that the relativistas describe. .