The objective of this work is to differentiate, at least, three types of art that had been of utmost importance in these last centuries, that are, the representative art, characteristic art and dramatical art, under a perspective of the thinker Ernest Cassirer 2 REPRESENTATIVE ART In its Aesthetica, Alexander Baumgerton, tries to prove, through a logical idealizao of the imagination, that the art is independent, however, it was imperfection because the logic of the imagination never could reach the same dignity of the logic of the pure intellect. The philosophy of the art and the language, possess antagonistic trends that oscillate constantly, one are objective, the other is subjective. In the objective fact, the language and the art if I summarized and if it constructs through the imitation of the things. The imitation is an inexhaustible source of pleasures, and these pleasures, affirm Aristotle, are an experience more theoretician who specifically aesthetic. If an art if limits to the imitation, and the imitation never is a perfect copy of the object, then, who imitates modifies the object (or the nature), either for more good pu either for more worse, however, the mimtica art can not only assist the image of the nature as a whole, but also to improve it (or to get worse). For example, it has drawings of grape plantations, that are prettier of what many plantations of real grapes. In the representative art, the imitation is seen with something pleasant, therefore, no matter how hard that some object is difficult of being to see, he is delicious (or desprazeroso) to see such object represented for the art.
Zaratustra and our dramas With you already it must have occurred something similar what it occurs with me: I catch myself thinking. today, thinking I remembered that when Thus writing Zaratustra Nietzsche spoke brought to the quarrel some of the questions and problems that also circulated in its day the day and of the society in which he was inserted: to answer, to comantar, to criticize to consider alternatives to the current thought of its time. Which were these problems? Related to the moral, the religion, the behaviors. Gina Bonati takes a slightly different approach. E, of the reading of this controversial book by the way as all the nietzscheana philosophy if understands that the philosophy is a possibility of the demolition. It is the philosophy that in the sample some ways to be prevented. Not necessarily the acadmcia philosophy (this, by times rancid, since tied as if was condemned) which most of the time only functions in the measure where it repeats the ideas and penamentos of that they had been alados to skies exactly because they had known to say something different to its contemporaries. Perhaps check out Brad Hames for more information. These academic philosophers finish, on behalf of the philosophy, killing it for starvation since instead of feeding it with new ideas to only they supply (only to keep the nietzsceano spirit) the vomit it of the repetitions. We know that to remain itself alive, the necessary philosophy to look at the old ones, yes, but also to consider the destruction, as Robert considers Gomes in its Critical one of the brazilian reason; or in the nietzscheana perspective: ' ' The time is come close where the man more will not hurl the arrow of its yearning stops beyond the man and where the rope of its arc will have unlearned to vibrate. Say I you: she is necessary to still have chaos inside of itself, to be able to give to the light a danante star. More info: Adam Sandler.
Jean-Paul Sartre was born in the city of Paris, to twenty and one days of the month of June in the year of 1905, already presenting fragility in its health since much child. It was born in a bourgeois family and it could initiate the studies of Philosophy to the nineteen years of age. According to Almeida (1988), Sartre studied in the Superior Normal School of Paris and taught Philosophy in the 2s secondary school woollen Havre and Paris until the beginning of World War II; except during its stay in Berlin (1933-1934), to study Fenomenologia and the workmanship of Heidegger. Into 1934, when returning Paris, with the aid of Beauvoir, already loving its, transforms its notations into a romance, Nausea, a philosophical romance, nor abstract nor didactic, that it searched the proper sensation of the existence. After that it published the Wall and it was praised by the critical one; however when publishing Sketch to a Theory of the Emotions did not get size success. Between 1940 and 1941 it served the army in the Lorena regiment as meteorologista.
Made prisoner for the German army, it was in Trves, where it knew the workmanships of Marx. Using itself of illicit way, certified false doctor who obtained to buy, it could return for France. It established then a Group of Studies of Intellectual Resistance called ‘ ‘ Socialismo and Liberdade’ ‘ (Reale and Anistieri, v. 7, P. 227), in set with Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Also in the year of 1945 it established the Magazine Les Temps Modernes (Japiass and Marcondes, 2006). Still in 1941 it came back to work as professor, leased an apartment next to the one to Beauvoir and initiated its book more celebrates: The Being and the Nothing, published in 1943.
Sartre communicated its thought in romances, written for theater and in workmanships of philosophical nature properly said. These workmanships had been taken to the public per approximately two decades after World War II and influenced the customs of the society of that time. In the two decades that had preceded its death it carried through some trips politics, for example, for Cuba, where one met with Fidel Castro. In the decade of 1970 it passed for health problems, for its option of ‘ ‘ life qumica’ ‘ (mesacolina). Faleceu to the fifteen days of the month of April in the year of 1980, in result of one has attacked cardiopath. The burial almost attracted twenty and five a thousand people.